Non-Verbal Argument Structure: Evidence from Tagalog
نویسندگان
چکیده
This dissertation examines the syntax and argument structure of non-verbal predicates (focusing primarily on adjectives) in Tagalog. Drawing on evidence from a variety of construction types (including Comparative, Existential, and Ellipsis constructions among others), I argue against the claim that adjectives differ from verbs in their ability to project an internal theme argument (Pesetsky 1982; Borer 1984, 1991; Levin and Rappaport 1986; Baker 2003; among others). More generally, I argue that evidence about the argument structure of non-verbal predicates offers a more general argument against strong decompositional views of argument in which both external and internal arguments are 'severed' from the predicate. Thesis Supervisor: David Pesetsky, Professor of Linguistics
منابع مشابه
Dependencies First: Eye Tracking Evidence from Sentence Production in Tagalog
We investigated the time course of sentence formulation in Tagalog, a verb-initial language in which the verb obligatorily agrees with one of its arguments. Eye-tracked participants described pictures of transitive events. Fixations to the two characters in the events were compared across sentences differing in agreement marking and post-verbal word order. Fixation patterns show evidence for tw...
متن کاملThe role of information structure for morphosyntactic choices in Tagalog
In this paper we investigate the influence of two information structure (IS) related aspects on the choice of voice form and sentence structure by Tagalog speakers. The first is the information status of argument referents. Tagalog is a multiple voice language, so almost every semantic argument in a sentence can be turned into the privileged syntactic argument (or subject) and be rendered salie...
متن کاملRecognising the Predicate-argument Structure of Tagalog
This paper describes research on parsing Tagalog text for predicate–argument structure (PAS). We first outline the linguistic phenomenon and corpus annotation process, then detail a series of PAS parsing experiments.
متن کاملReasoning about definiteness in a language without articles ∗
Most theories of implicature make reference to a notion of alternatives. Interlocutors reason about what the speaker could have said. In this paper, I investigate the structure of these alternatives. In particular, I ask how these alternative utterances are constrained by the interlocutors’ grammar. I argue that in order to derive certain implicatures, alternative utterances must be analyzed li...
متن کاملOn Some Ways to Test Tagalog Nominalism from a Crosslinguistic Perspective
Daniel Kaufman's core proposal is that much of what is typologically special about Tagalog syntax is rooted in the language having nouns but not verbs as its core lexical categories. He sees this at two levels. First, bare roots in Tagalog are nominal rather than verbal; for example, bili on its own means 'price bought for' rather than 'buy'. Second, he claims that fully inflected " verbs " in ...
متن کامل